|
While promising, wave tank tests also revealed meritorious deficiencies. Non-resonant buoy actuation delay was promoted by high center of buoyancy and lack of tangential surface resistance to water particle motion. This condition indicated deriving possibly improved wave following capability from partially submerged buoy shapes having low centers of buoyancy and maximal planar contact with the hydroface. Fully submerged, however, these configurations typically embody added mass forces. A most efficient hybrid buoy shape incorporates smooth laminar flow and maximal buoyancy within design parameters. Whereas inclined reciprocation axes operated favorably to expand buoy capture distance by allowing simultaneous absorption of both the vertical force component of buoyancy and the horizontal time component of buoy/wave crest engagement with respect to wave procession, using buoy displacement for directly raising and lowering associated linear electrical generators caused wave-reciprocation frequency matching problems. Often, the time delay shortened or nullified reciprocation of the rods and associated generators due to their antiphasal movement with ambient wave fields. Although energy conversion was very direct, power generation was diminished during stroke reversal and start-up. Enhanced electrical output is obtained by relocating and improving generator components. The sacrifice of any peak value electrical outputs of the linear generator configuration should be acceptable in comparison to advantages of efficient output produced by a contemplated and proposed electromechanical assembly. |
|
|
| About OWECO | Our Mission | Inception | Tank Test | Breadboard | Drawing |
| OWEB Map | Proposal | Contact Us | Discussion Forum | - Ocean Wave Energy Company - |
|